By 
Eurozone officials have begun a two-year transition to refresh most of the European Central Bank’s (ECB) six-member Executive Board—including replacing President Christine Lagarde—triggering renewed scrutiny over the institution’s persistent diversity shortcomings and what they may mean for monetary policymaking in a 20-country currency union.
Unlike the U.S. Federal Reserve, which faces political pressure over leadership changes and rate decisions, the ECB’s institutional design ensures its independence remains intact. But the same structures that shield the bank from political interference have also contributed to one of the weakest diversity records in global central banking—a field still dominated by white male leaders from major Western economies.
A Critical Moment for Representation
The first major opening arrives early next year when Vice-President Luis de Guindos’ term ends. Many see this as an opportunity to correct long-standing imbalances across gender, geography, and professional backgrounds.
Critics argue that the ECB’s lack of diversity creates blind spots, limiting policymakers’ understanding of the lived realities of the eurozone’s 350 million residents—particularly around inflation, household stress, and the distributional impact of interest rates.
The disparities are stark. Of the ECB’s 26-member Governing Council—the body that sets interest rates—24 members are men. All 20 national central bank governors are men. On the Executive Board, representation has been concentrated among the eurozone’s largest economies: France, Germany, Italy, and Spain. No country from the former Eastern Bloc—now one-third of the eurozone—has ever held a seat.
Lagarde, the ECB’s first female president, remains one of the few women to reach the institution’s top leadership. Since 1998, women have occupied just 19% of all Executive Board positions.
“The ECB’s track record on female representation is appalling,” said Maria Demertzis of The Conference Board. “Diversity matters. You cannot make sound decisions when the people making them reflect only a narrow segment of society.”
A Symbolic Shift or Meaningful Change?
Candidates from Croatia, Finland, Greece, Latvia, and Portugal have entered the race to replace de Guindos—suggesting a smaller or Eastern European state may finally gain representation.
However, analysts caution that the vice-president role is viewed as the least influential among the upcoming vacancies.
“If an Eastern European candidate is chosen, it may be more symbolic than substantive,” said ING economist Carsten Brzeski. “Berlin and Paris would rather save political capital for the key appointments coming in 2027.”
By contrast, countries like the UK, Sweden, and Norway have made faster progress:
-
The Bank of England’s Monetary Policy Committee now has a female majority.
-
Sweden’s Riksbank board has reached gender parity.
-
Norway’s board maintains near balance with a female governor.
The U.S. Federal Reserve has also become more diverse—though current political efforts threaten to reverse some gains.
A deeper challenge remains the pipeline: women are still underrepresented across financial institutions. A Dallas Fed study showed that over two decades, women economists in the Federal Reserve System rose only marginally—from 20% to 22%.
Institutional Constraints Shape the Selection Process
The ECB does not directly influence Executive Board appointments. Candidates are nominated by eurozone finance ministers, vetted by the European Parliament, and formally appointed by EU leaders. Parliament can delay or protest selections—especially on gender grounds—but cannot veto them.
Some lawmakers believe the current wave of vacancies presents a unique opportunity.
“With four roles changing, we can build a balanced package,” said Markus Ferber of the European Parliament’s Economic and Monetary Affairs Committee. “It is easier to tick all the boxes when you look at the bigger picture.”
Why Diversity Matters for Monetary Policy
Research suggests that gender-balanced central bank boards may improve policy outcomes. A 2020 study from Bocconi University and Trinity College found that female policymakers tend to be more hawkish on inflation, potentially enhancing central bank credibility.
Lagarde herself has repeatedly argued that inflation disproportionately harms women, low-income households, and vulnerable groups—yet she remains limited in shaping who sits around the table.
“With Lagarde at the top, the ECB finally has the conditions for genuine change—but they are stuck,” Demertzis noted. “There simply isn’t a strong pipeline of women rising through the ranks to reach these senior roles.”
As the ECB navigates a new leadership cycle, questions remain whether this reshuffle will deliver structural transformation—or another symbolic gesture that leaves deep-rooted disparities unaddressed.
Comments