By 
The regulatory landscape for buy now, pay later (BNPL) providers is undergoing a significant transformation in 2025, as the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) continues its efforts to establish oversight. This regulatory push could either solidify BNPL’s place in mainstream credit or impose constraints that reshape the industry.
The CFPB’s Regulatory Framework
In May 2024, the CFPB issued an interpretive rule classifying BNPL pay-in-four services as credit products under Regulation Z. This classification mandates that BNPL users receive the same consumer protections as credit cardholders, including the right to dispute charges, request refunds, and pause payments during disputes. Additionally, BNPL providers must now meet new disclosure requirements, such as issuing periodic billing statements akin to those used by credit card companies.
The CFPB’s guidance reflects the growing role of BNPL in consumer finance. BNPL has become a favored option for individuals facing cash flow constraints, with “cash flow-compromised consumers” being 3.5 times more likely to use BNPL compared to other groups. Interestingly, BNPL is also gaining traction among higher-income consumers, with one-third of those earning over $100,000 annually reporting usage of the service.
While the interpretive rule officially took effect in July 2024, the CFPB stated it would not impose penalties on BNPL providers making good-faith efforts to transition into compliance. This approach is intended to provide a grace period for companies to adjust to the new regulatory framework.
Industry Pushback and Legal Challenges
Despite these allowances, the CFPB’s rule has faced significant criticism from BNPL providers. PayPal has argued that the rule does not adequately consider the unique structures of BNPL products or provide clear guidance on new compliance obligations. Affirm has also called for greater clarity on the timing of required periodic statements.
These concerns culminated in a lawsuit filed in October by the Financial Technology Association (FTA), challenging the CFPB’s interpretive rule. The FTA argued that the sudden application of Regulation Z contradicts years of guidance suggesting BNPL products were exempt. The association highlighted the operational challenges posed by the new requirements, such as the impracticality of issuing periodic statements for individual closed-end loans on the mandated timeline.
A Year of Uncertainty Ahead
The legal and regulatory disputes in 2025 are set to shape the future of BNPL. Industry stakeholders argue that the new rules could stifle innovation and disrupt existing business models. Meanwhile, the potential restructuring of the CFPB under a new administration adds another layer of uncertainty. Any changes to the agency’s authority or rulemaking processes could alter the trajectory of BNPL oversight.
Navigating the Transition
As the CFPB and BNPL providers continue their standoff, the industry faces a pivotal year. Companies must balance compliance with operational efficiency, while policymakers must ensure that regulations protect consumers without hindering innovation. The outcomes of these clashes will likely define the evolution of BNPL as a critical component of consumer finance.
Comments